The Payment Journey Doesn’t Start at Checkout
September 8, 2026
Part 4 of KUBRA’s 2026 Utility Customer Experience Blog Series
Over the past decade, utilities have built a robust digital billing and payments foundation, one that meets customers’ evolving needs and elevates the overall payment experience. With that box checked, it’s tempting to sit back and think the payment journey is running smoothly. But there’s another opportunity that lies just around the corner, one that extends beyond the transaction itself.
Contrary to popular belief, the payment journey doesn’t begin at the checkout. It starts the moment a customer opens their bill, a starting point we explored here. Now it’s time to look at what happens next. The steps between opening the bill and completing the payment are where the real opportunity lies.
Communications, channel choice, payment flexibility, checkout, recovery, confirmation, and self-service all shape how easily customers can move through that journey. Each interaction may be strong on its own, but unless they’re connected, the experience will never feel seamless.
Digital Channels Are Already the Center of the Journey
Utilities have done a great job adapting their billing and payment options to our digital age. And customers are here for it. Today, 60% of customers primarily pay by logging into their utility’s website or app, making utility-owned digital channels the primary payment experience. Bank bill pay remains an important channel for 21% of customers, while 7% primarily use guest payment. Traditional channels see far less use: 4% mail, 3% phone, and 2% in person.
Satisfaction backs this up. 75% of customers are satisfied or very satisfied with their available digital channels, a strong foundation to build on.
The real opportunity now is to turn these payment channels into full interaction channels that connect payments with relevant communications, account information, AutoPay, paperless billing, and self-service. At the same time, utilities also need to preserve simple, streamlined paths for customers who want to pay quickly without logging in, recognizing that not every digital interaction needs to become a full account experience.
Payment Choice Is About More Than the Method
Customers want predictability, but not at the cost of flexibility. 63% agree their bills are predictable, yet only 47% agree they have flexibility in how and when they pay. That gap points to a real opportunity to give customers more control over the timing of payment, not just the method.
It also matters because it's tied to how customers feel about their finances. Only half of customers (50%) believe their payment options help reduce financial stress. When bills are predictable, but payment itself is rigid, customers are left with fewer ways to adapt when circumstances change.
Looking ahead, there's room to grow. 37% of customers see value in future flexibility options like installment plans or buy now, pay later (BNPL), and another 32% remain neutral. This is a sizable group that hasn't ruled it out and could be won over with the right approach.
A strong payment journey isn't only about offering multiple methods. It's about giving customers control over when they pay and options they can turn to if their circumstances change. And those options need to be easy to find if customers are going to use them.
The Mechanics Are Working, But That’s Not Enough
Utilities have made meaningful investments in payment infrastructure, and customers generally recognize that. When asked about ease of payment, processing speed, and reliability, 52% of customers are “very satisfied.” Satisfaction drops slightly to 49% for channel and payment method availability and further still to 45% for security confidence.
The bigger gap and biggest weakness is clarity of charges, with only 33% of customers “very satisfied.” This is distinct from bill clarity itself; this is about whether customers understand what they’re being charged at the moment of payment. And shows that the biggest friction may happen before or around the transaction, not within payment processing itself.
That distinction matters because customers can complete a payment successfully and still leave the experience confused about what they paid for and why. That confusion can contribute to support calls, disputes, and declining trust.
Removing Friction Can Keep Customers Moving
And that confusion is one sign of a larger pattern. Satisfaction with the mechanics doesn't guarantee a frictionless path to payment completion. It’s encouraging that 46% of customers rarely experience payment issues, and 23% never do. However, 30% experience issues at least sometimes, including 12% who experience them often or very often.
When something goes wrong, the impact is real: 62% of customers delay or abandon their payment. This suggests utilities don't have to rebuild the entire payment experience from scratch, but rather identify and address the specific moments (e.g., website errors, confusing navigation, failed transactions) when payment momentum breaks down and fix them.
Reducing these friction points can help turn the intention to pay into actual completed payments.
But utilities can only fix what they can see, and without a connected platform, most only have visibility into a single channel at a time, making it difficult to map the full journey and spot where customers are actually getting stuck.
Design for Recovery, Not Just Completion
Friction can lead to abandonment. But it doesn’t have to, because a failed transaction doesn't necessarily represent an unwillingness to pay. That’s why what happens right after a failed payment attempt is just as important as preventing it in the first place.
Recovery is an important part of payment journey design. Clear next steps following a failed transaction can be the difference between a customer trying again and giving up. Immediate follow-up gives customers another path to completion before a missed payment becomes a late payment.
Designing for recovery protects the customer's momentum and the utility's revenue.
Measure the Journey, Not Just the Transaction
Transaction success will always be an important metric. But it doesn’t tell the whole story. It captures only one moment of the experience.
With that in mind, utilities need to look more closely at:
- Where customers begin their payment journey
- The channels they choose
- Whether there’s appropriate payment flexibility
- Where customers encounter friction or drop off
- How often failed transactions are successfully recovered
- Whether customers ultimately complete payment
Tracking all of these metrics creates a more complete picture of payment performance than transaction-processing alone.
Utilities want to get paid, and most customers want to pay their utility bills. Utilities increase the likelihood of that happening by creating a journey where customers move smoothly from intent to payment, choosing their payment method, making the payment, and seeing it through to completion.
The right technology makes this easier to achieve and to measure. A unified payment platform gives utilities visibility into the entire journey, not just the endpoint. Friction points become easy to spot and smooth over, and customers experience payment as one seamless step rather than a series of hurdles.
When utilities can see the whole path, they're in a far better position to help customers actually get there.
This is the fourth post in KUBRA’s 2026 Utility Customer Experience Blog Series, based on original research from our white paper, The Utility Billing and Payment Journey: Identifying Where Customer Friction Still Exists.
Read the full white paper